The age-old dictum: good is the enemy of great has no greater foothold than in our schools – or so it seems. Once I have been forgiven for my gross generalisations, perhaps take a moment to listen to my rant.
The work that I do and the organisation I run, exists because schools are not doing the job they are designed to do. Now, in one sense I am not complaining – I love my work. But on the other hand, we support schools to have an intentional, research-driven and educationally sound methodology and curriculum to grow students in the skills they need to survive and succeed in life – skills like time management, or organisation, or motivation.
For many years, the dominant model has been to hire an external presenter to come and deliver a day of ‘study skills’ seminars, once a year (at best). However, it frustrates me immensely when this model is adopted – and I am partly to blame – we are often the external presenter. The problem is, the very reason we took over 2 years of intensive research and entirely remodelled our business was because this model of growing students in these skill-based areas is almost useless.
The research on this point has been clear for a long time – skill development does not take place via a once off informational download. That would be like reading a book about Lance Armstrong and then being expected to know how to ride a bike – the technique is impotent to deliver the outcome.
Instead, skill-development (which is absolutely what these areas entail) is an ongoing process of ‘new strategies’ being understood, adopted, ill-applied, but then refined over time. It requires ongoing support, ongoing accountability and ongoing access to the tools required to trial and develop these skills.
When we speak with schools and are informed, “Oh, so you run study-skills workshops… oh we do those too. It seems our school already does what you do”, I get hot under the collar and feel like pointing out that their ad hoc, unintentional, “tick-the-box”, information deluge they refer to as a student development program is unlikely to deliver any of the proposed results – in fact, it often means that schools outsource that entire conversation to these one-off sessions.
Indeed, schools often take a lot of persuading that if they truly desire for their students to master key areas like Learning, Planning, Organisation, Goal Setting and Self-Regulation, they need to adopt a more intentional, thoughtful and intensive approach. Because at the end of the day, we do not want to create young people capable of regurgitating the population of our continent (a symptom of our over indulged emphasis on curriculum outcomes), we want them to be confident, independent, and resilient learners equipped with the skills to thrive in life.
So no, for the record, the mere existence of a mediocre “study skills program” is not a sufficient reason for schools to neglect considering how they are actually supporting and investing in their students in these critical areas that will dramatically impact their life opportunities and likelihood of success.